• Improper welding of X80 pipeline may cause cracks
• Brief introduction of API X52 pipeline steel
• The difference between PSL1 and PSL2
• Harm of inclusions in X70 pipeline steel
• API 5L pipeline pipe
• X52 steel plate surface quality standards that need to be met
• The basic production process of API 5L X60 pipeline steel
• The key to Q460D steel welding process
• What does the heat treatment of Q690 Steel include?
• Reasons for choosing Q690D steel

Response to the United States 337 investigation practice for the Chinese steel

337 investigations can be regarded as weapons of mass destruction in international trade. Before, there are many countries in the survey eaten a dark loss. Chinese steel companies can retreat in this contest, can’t but say it is not a small miracle.
From the past experience of trade protection to give up the respondent, choose to let the profits will not allow the market to swallow up, and now China's steel companies are about to snatch the United States 337 investigation, the face of trade friction, the Chinese steel companies quietly in the mentality and awareness changes . At the same time, it shows that as long as they are united and actively responded to trade frictions, Chinese steel companies are fully confident and able to break this trade blockade and safeguard their legitimate rights and interests in the international market.
As soon as Chinese steel enterprises fully win the long-term 337 investigation, international trade of Chinese steel is likely to enter a new phase from passive beating to active defense in the future to maximize the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises in overseas markets. A resulting butterfly effect may quietly occur in the international trade of Chinese steel in the future.
First, this response to the United States 337 investigation practice for the Chinese steel companies have accumulated in the traditional trade level above the industrial policy, business model, the field of intellectual property trade game experience. This provides a feasible case and a model for China's steel enterprises to deal with similar trade protection measures in the future.
Second, the result of the U.S. 337 investigation will eventually clear the suspicion of alleged disrupters and spoilers in the international market of Chinese steel products, further confirming China Steel's outstanding contribution to the global economic development and the steady development of international trade.
Thirdly, after this investigation of U.S. 337, the Chinese steelmakers will be more aware that in the face of trade protectionism, concessions will only lose the entire market. Only by proactively answering will there be opportunities to build the right of speech in the international market.

337 investigations can be regarded as weapons of mass destruction in international trade. Before, there are many countries in the survey eaten a dark loss. Chinese steel companies can retreat in this contest, can’t but say it is not a small miracle.
From the past experience of trade protection to give up the respondent, choose to let the profits will not allow the market to swallow up, and now China's steel companies are about to snatch the United States 337 investigation, the face of trade friction, the Chinese steel companies quietly in the mentality and awareness changes . At the same time, it shows that as long as they are united and actively responded to trade frictions, Chinese steel companies are fully confident and able to break this trade blockade and safeguard their legitimate rights and interests in the international market.
As soon as Chinese steel enterprises fully win the long-term 337 investigation, international trade of Chinese steel is likely to enter a new phase from passive beating to active defense in the future to maximize the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises in overseas markets. A resulting butterfly effect may quietly occur in the international trade of Chinese steel in the future.
First, this response to the United States 337 investigation practice for the Chinese steel companies have accumulated in the traditional trade level above the industrial policy, business model, the field of intellectual property trade game experience. This provides a feasible case and a model for China's steel enterprises to deal with similar trade protection measures in the future.
Second, the result of the U.S. 337 investigation will eventually clear the suspicion of alleged disrupters and spoilers in the international market of Chinese steel products, further confirming China Steel's outstanding contribution to the global economic development and the steady development of international trade.
Thirdly, after this investigation of U.S. 337, the Chinese steelmakers will be more aware that in the face of trade protectionism, concessions will only lose the entire market. Only by proactively answering will there be opportunities to build the right of speech in the international market.